Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao World Neurosurgeryarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
World Neurosurgery
Article . 2019 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Timing of Surgical Decompression for Cauda Equina Syndrome

Authors: William B, Hogan; Eren O, Kuris; Wesley M, Durand; Adam E M, Eltorai; Alan H, Daniels;

Timing of Surgical Decompression for Cauda Equina Syndrome

Abstract

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a potentially devastating spinal condition requiring prompt diagnosis and intervention. This study examines the relationship between timing of surgery and patient outcomes such as mortality and total complications, and longitudinal trends in timing of operative treatment over the years 2000-2014.This study considered patients in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample Database between 2000 and 2014 who had both an International Classification of Disease, Ninth Edition, Clinical Modification code for CES (344.61) and an International Classification of Disease, Ninth Edition, Clinical Modification procedure code for either disc excision (8051) or spinal canal exploration and decompression (0309) in their inpatient record. Patients were separated into an early surgical intervention cohort versus a delayed intervention cohort, and associated outcomes were analyzed using linear regression. Trends in timing of surgery were examined for the years 2000-2014, and linear regression was used to assess degree of change over time.In total, 20,924 patients with CES met inclusion criteria. Following adjustment for demographic variables, the delayed-intervention group was associated with statistically significant increased inpatient mortality (odds ratio [OR] 9.60, P = 0.002), total complications (OR 1.41, P = 0.018), and non-routine discharge (OR 2.37, P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients receiving early intervention within 48 hours remained unchanged from 2000 to 2014 ranging from 80.2% (2000-2002) to 76.2% (2012-2014) (P = 0.190).This study represents the largest investigation to date examining CES and reveals the timing of surgical management for CES has not changed appreciably from 2000 to 2014 despite mounting evidence for early decompression. Patients receiving decompression within 0 or 1 day after admission are associated with improved inpatient outcomes, including lower complication and mortality rates.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Databases, Factual, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Cauda Equina Syndrome, Middle Aged, Decompression, Surgical, Neurosurgical Procedures, Cohort Studies, Postoperative Complications, Child, Preschool, Humans, Female, Hospital Mortality, Child, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    30
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
30
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!