
pmid: 29969736
Of cavernous malformations (CMs) treated with radiosurgery (RS), 5% bleed after 2-year initial latency period. This rate is similar to failure rate of RS for other pathologies, which often require repeat RS for favorable outcome. The aim of this pilot study was to define failure of CM RS and to assess safety of second RS.Retrospective analysis was performed of 7 of 345 CMs retreated with RS; 6 CMs were deep-seated, and 1 was superficial. Median time between the 2 treatments was 8 years (range, 3-16 years), and median follow-up time after second RS was 3 years (range, 1-9 years).Following the 2-year latency period after RS, 6% of deep-seated and 5% of hemispheric CMs, and 6% of deep-seated and 2% of hemispheric lesions caused transient neurologic deficits without hemorrhage. A second treatment was indicated for rebleed in 5 cases and for recurrent transient neurologic deficits in 2 cases. Prescribed dose was 15 Gy (range, 12-20 Gy) at first treatment and 12 Gy (range, 12-18 Gy) at second treatment. Target volumes were 692 mm3 (range, 54-2400 mm3) and 935 mm3 (range, 150-1550 mm3) at first and second treatments, respectively, and treatment volumes were 811 mm3 (range, 79-2500 mm3) and 962 mm3 (range, 194-1750 mm3), respectively. Differences in treatment parameters were not significant. Reason for failure was inaccurate target definition in only 2 cases. There were no bleeds, morbidity, or mortality after second RS.Second RS applied to previously treated CMs is safe and may be effective. Further investigations are needed to verify these findings and assess long-term benefit of second RS.
Adult, Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations, Male, Reoperation, Pilot Projects, Middle Aged, Radiosurgery, Young Adult, Treatment Outcome, Arteriovenous Fistula, Humans, Female, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations, Male, Reoperation, Pilot Projects, Middle Aged, Radiosurgery, Young Adult, Treatment Outcome, Arteriovenous Fistula, Humans, Female, Retrospective Studies
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
