
pmid: 15223276
It is often desirable to quantify both dissolved Cr(VI) and total Cr in samples accurately. Various protocols are now being utilized to quantify the amount of total chromium in natural waters and each of these has possible interferences. This study describes the shortcomings of each method when particulate iron is present in a water sample, and a more rigorous digestion protocol is tested. Data from bench studies as well as a field survey of 21 water utilities are presented. Additionally, field data from several hundred water utility samples are presented to illustrate the potential for incomplete recovery of total chromium using accepted protocols.
Civil and Environmental Engineering, Chromium, Data Collection, Iron, Carcinogens, Environmental, Chemistry Techniques, Analytical, Water Supply, water sample, Water Pollutants, chromium, UWRL, Environmental Monitoring
Civil and Environmental Engineering, Chromium, Data Collection, Iron, Carcinogens, Environmental, Chemistry Techniques, Analytical, Water Supply, water sample, Water Pollutants, chromium, UWRL, Environmental Monitoring
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 47 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
