<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 19298939
Predicting humoral alloimmune potential in transplant recipients is the objective of histocompatibility testing and depends upon accurate donor typing and sensitive and specific testing for antibodies to human leukocyte antigen. This review for the transplant clinician will describe the evolution and current practices of histocompatibility testing methods for typing, crossmatching and antibody screening. Novel methods of measuring T-cell alloimmune potential will also be briefly discussed. Emphasis is given to the clinical applicability and limitations of each test, and the collective consideration of all tests in concert, as part of the immunologic risk assessment of the solid organ transplant recipient.
Histocompatibility, Histocompatibility Testing, Humans, Transplants
Histocompatibility, Histocompatibility Testing, Humans, Transplants
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 40 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |