
pmid: 30497791
handle: 10182/10955
Ecological niches reflect not only adaptation to local circumstances but also the tendency of related lineages to share environmental tolerances. As a result, information on phylogenetic relationships has underappreciated potential to inform ecological niche modeling. Here we review three strategies for incorporating evolutionary information into niche models: splitting lineages into subunits, lumping across lineages, and partial pooling of lineages into a common statistical framework that implicitly or explicitly accounts for evolutionary relationships. We challenge the default practice of modeling at the species level, which ignores the process of niche evolution and erroneously assumes that the species is always the appropriate level for niche estimation. Progress in the field requires reexamination of how we assess models of niches versus models of distributions.
580, 570, Genetic Speciation, Plant Dispersal, species distribution model, phylogenetic niche conservatism, ANZSRC::31 Biological sciences, Biological, Biological Evolution, Models, Biological, multiresponse model, Models, ANZSRC::41 Environmental sciences, Animal Distribution, ecological niche model, Ecosystem, Phylogeny, local adaptation
580, 570, Genetic Speciation, Plant Dispersal, species distribution model, phylogenetic niche conservatism, ANZSRC::31 Biological sciences, Biological, Biological Evolution, Models, Biological, multiresponse model, Models, ANZSRC::41 Environmental sciences, Animal Distribution, ecological niche model, Ecosystem, Phylogeny, local adaptation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 204 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
