
pmid: 30241778
The genomics revolution has sparked interest in using our increased understanding of the loci involved in phenotypic variation and adaptation to advance the conservation of biodiversity. Despite much interest and discussion, it remains unclear whether, when, and how such analyses should be used to guide conservation action. Such 'gene-targeted' conservation strategies, while promising, are complicated by several factors including the complex genomic architecture of phenotypic variation and the strong potential for undesirable outcomes such as the loss of genome-wide genetic variation and evolutionary potential. We caution against relying on gene-targeted approaches as a conservation silver bullet and propose rigorous criteria to identify situations where gene-targeted approaches are likely to benefit conservation.
Conservation of Natural Resources, Genetics, Population, Animals, Genetic Variation, Biodiversity, Genomics, Plants, Adaptation, Physiological, Biological Evolution
Conservation of Natural Resources, Genetics, Population, Animals, Genetic Variation, Biodiversity, Genomics, Plants, Adaptation, Physiological, Biological Evolution
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 115 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
