
pmid: 25262501
Experimental and theoretical studies show that mortality imposed on a population can counter-intuitively increase the density of a specific life-history stage or total population density. Understanding positive population-level effects of mortality is advancing, illuminating implications for population, community, and applied ecology. Reconciling theory and data, we found that the mathematical models used to study mortality effects vary in the effects predicted and mechanisms proposed. Experiments predominantly demonstrate stage-specific density increases in response to mortality. We argue that the empirical evidence supports theory based on stage-structured population models but not on unstructured models. We conclude that stage-specific positive mortality effects are likely to be common in nature and that accounting for within-population individual variation is essential for developing ecological theory.
570, 330, Population Dynamics, GF Human ecology. Anthropogeography, biomass overcompensation, consumer-resource model, population dynamics, Animals, Biomass, Mortality, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Population Density, Life Cycle Stages, stage-structure, hydra effect, numerical response, size-structure, Models, Theoretical, mortality, density dependence, fisheries, population management, predation, pest control
570, 330, Population Dynamics, GF Human ecology. Anthropogeography, biomass overcompensation, consumer-resource model, population dynamics, Animals, Biomass, Mortality, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Population Density, Life Cycle Stages, stage-structure, hydra effect, numerical response, size-structure, Models, Theoretical, mortality, density dependence, fisheries, population management, predation, pest control
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 95 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
