Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Transplantation Proc...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Transplantation Proceedings
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Perfusate Exchange Does Not Improve Outcomes in 24-hour Ex Situ Lung Perfusion

Authors: Keir Forgie; Abeline Watkins; Katie Du; Alynne Ribano; Nicholas Fialka; Sayed Himmat; Sanaz Hatami; +6 Authors

Perfusate Exchange Does Not Improve Outcomes in 24-hour Ex Situ Lung Perfusion

Abstract

Reliable 24-hour preservation is required to optimize the rehabilitation potential of Ex Situ Lung Perfusion (ESLP). Other ESLP protocols include fresh perfusate replacement to counteract an accumulation of deleterious by-products. We describe the results of our reliable 24-hour negative pressure ventilation (NPV)-ESLP protocol with satisfactory acute post-transplant outcomes and investigate perfusate exchange (PE) as a modification to enhance prolonged ESLP.Twelve pig lungs underwent 24 hours of NPV-ESLP using 1.5L of cellular perfusate (500 mL packed red blood cells and 1 L buffered perfusate). The Control (n = 6) had no PE; the PE (n = 6) had 500 mL replaced after 12 hours of NPV-ESLP with 1000 mL fresh perfusate. Three left lungs per group were transplanted.Results are reported as Control vs PE (mean ± SEM). Both groups demonstrated stable and acceptable oxygenation during 24 hours of ESLP with final PF ratios of 527.5 ± 42.19 and 488.4 ± 35.38 (P = .25). Final compliance measurements were 20.52 ± 3.59 and 18.55 ± 2.91 (P = .34). There were no significant differences in pulmonary artery pressure after 24 hours of ESLP (10.02 ± 2.69 vs 14.34 ± 1.64, P = .10), and pulmonary vascular resistance only differed significantly at T12 (417.6 ± 53.06 vs 685.4 ± 81.19, P = .02). Percentage weight gain between groups was similar (24.32 ± 8.4 and 45.33 ± 7.76, P = .07). Post-transplant left lung oxygenation was excellent (327.3 ± 14.62 and 313.3 ± 15.38, P = .28). There was no significant difference in % weight gain of lungs post-transplant (22.20 ± 7.22 vs 14.36 ± 9.96, P = .28).Acceptable lung function was maintained during 24-hour NPV-ESLP and post-transplant regardless of PE.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Perfusion, Time Factors, Swine, Organ Preservation Solutions, Animals, Organ Preservation, Lung, Lung Transplantation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!