Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Transplantation Proc...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Transplantation Proceedings
Article . 2018 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Liver Graft Rejection

Authors: C-C, Lin; H-Y, Ou; Y-H, Chuang; H-J, Chiang; C-C, Yu; M, Lazo; L L-C, Tsang; +4 Authors

Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Liver Graft Rejection

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) in the assessment of graft rejection after liver transplantation (LT).From June 2017 to January 2018, 32 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 52.3 years. All patients underwent LT. The DWMRI was performed using the apparent diffusion coefficient map and measuring the different b-values (b-400, b-600, b-800, and b-1000). These measurements were compared with the histopathology results. Statistical analysis included t test, analysis of variance, and area under the curve for receiver operating characteristic (ROC).There were 17 patients without rejection and 15 patients with liver graft rejection diagnosed by histopathology. The mean (SD) results between the nonrejection and rejection groups were as follows: b-400 = 1.568 (0.265) vs 1.519 (0.119) (P = .089), b-600 = 1.380 (0.181) vs 1.284 (0.106) (P = .039), b-800 = 1.262 (0.170) vs 1.170 (0.086) (P = .035), b-1000 = 1.109 (0.129) vs 1.098 (0.078) (P = .095); B-values × 10-3 mm2/s. Only b-600 (P = .04) and b-800 (P = .04) values have significant differences between the 2 groups. B-600 showed 90.48% sensitivity and 83.33% specificity (ROC area under the curve = 0.784; P < .001), and b-800 showed 90.38% sensitivity and 83.03% specificity (ROC area under the curve = 0.816; P < .001). The values obtained with the apparent diffusion coefficient in b-800 were clearly differentiated between the mild, moderate, and severe degrees of rejection (P < .001).Measurement of b-600 and b-800 values using DWMRI may be used for the diagnosis of graft rejection after LT.

Keywords

Adult, Graft Rejection, Male, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Liver Transplantation, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Liver, ROC Curve, Humans, Female, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!