
pmid: 21335197
Hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with malignant hematologic diseases. Neutrophil (NEUT) and platelet (PLT) counts are used to evaluate hematologic engraftment of transplanted patients. Recent-generation hematology analyzers offer an alternative way to evaluate immature peripheral blood (PB) cell fractions, which may also give an indication of hematopoietic recovery. The immature reticulocyte fraction (IRF) and immature platelet fraction (IPF) in PB samples may provide early indicators of transplant success. We evaluated the predictive value of IRF and IPF for the hematologic recovery of 46 adult patients undergoing allogeneic PB progenitor cell transplantation. We observed that IRF recovery anticipated by 4 days compared with NEUT recovery (11 vs 15 d) and IPF by 2 days compared with PLT (10 vs 12 d). The recovery was different for patients undergoing a nonmyeloablative regimen (NMA); we observed an early IRF recovery by 5 days compared with NEUT (10 vs 15 d) and a IPF compared with PLT recovery by 2 days (9 vs 11 d). We also observed significant correlations between NEUT and PLT recovery with recoveries of the new parameters IRF and IPF. We concluded that IRF and IPF predicted hematopoietic recovery. For allografted patients after NMA regimens, prediction was even more clinically relevant. These immature fractions open new perspectives for monitoring patient transfusion support through the posttransplantation recovery.
Adult, Blood Platelets, Reticulocytes, Hematologic Neoplasms, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Humans, Transplantation, Homologous
Adult, Blood Platelets, Reticulocytes, Hematologic Neoplasms, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Humans, Transplantation, Homologous
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 27 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
