
pmid: 18089303
It is of crucial importance that harvested organs are not discarded because of lesions inflicted during the procurement operation. From January 2005 to January 2006, a total of 395 organs were procured: 266 kidneys, 102 livers, and 27 pancreas. Two kidneys were lost due to vascular lesions, and 1 liver could not be transplanted because of a severe parenchymal injury (0.75% total organ losses). In 33 of 198 cases (16.7%) despite lesions to renal vessels or to the ureter, the kidneys were transplanted after back-table repair procedures. Vascular lesions were observed in 10% of the evaluated livers (8 of 102) and in 3 of 18 pancreatic grafts. In the literature, a total organ loss of 0.75% because of technical problems demonstrates a high standard of visceral organ procurement in our region. Hence, reparable vascular and ureteral lesions in 10% to 16.4% indicated the need for better surgical training and standardization in procurement techniques. We believe that double-checking both the organ and quality reports and giving immediate feedback to the procurement surgeons in cases of technical problems are effective ways to perform quality control. It must be our goal to increase the response rate of the quality forms.
Tissue and Organ Procurement, Treatment Outcome, Germany, Tissue and Organ Harvesting, Humans, Pancreas Transplantation, Kidney Transplantation, Liver Transplantation, Retrospective Studies
Tissue and Organ Procurement, Treatment Outcome, Germany, Tissue and Organ Harvesting, Humans, Pancreas Transplantation, Kidney Transplantation, Liver Transplantation, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
