
The new dialytic and medical therapies have improved the survival of uremic patients and their preservation of a efficacious clinical condition so as to warrant suitability for transplantation, even after a long period of dialysis. In addition, today the use of a "marginal donor" and "marginal kidney" are often used to increase the pool of available organs, so that the surgeon must face more technical difficulties than in the past; anomalies of the donor kidney, harvesting and bench surgery damages, as well as vascular pathologies in the recipient. A review of our 151 renal transplantations from January 1999 to May 2003 showed that it was often possible to overcome these technical difficulties yielding good results. This work sought to demonstrate that neither "marginal donor"/"marginal kidney" used to expand donor pool nor recipient vascular pathologies should be considered transplant contraindications. Knowledge of various technical options and the ability to put them rapidly into practice are necessary to use any organ.
vascular anomalies; kidney transplantation, kidney transplantation, Kidney Transplantation, Nephrectomy, Renal Veins, Tissue Donors, vascular anomalies, Renal Artery, Treatment Outcome, Tissue and Organ Harvesting, Blood Vessels, Humans, Vascular Diseases, Retrospective Studies
vascular anomalies; kidney transplantation, kidney transplantation, Kidney Transplantation, Nephrectomy, Renal Veins, Tissue Donors, vascular anomalies, Renal Artery, Treatment Outcome, Tissue and Organ Harvesting, Blood Vessels, Humans, Vascular Diseases, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
