Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Theoretical Populati...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Theoretical Population Biology
Article . 2007 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
zbMATH Open
Article . 2007
Data sources: zbMATH Open
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

A general framework for marker-assisted selection

Authors: Hu, Xin-Sheng;

A general framework for marker-assisted selection

Abstract

Early simulation studies have showed that the inclusion of epistatic components (especially the additive-by-additive effects) into marker-assisted selection (MAS) can improve selection efficiency for a short-term breeding program. In this study I extend Lande and Thompson's theory to incorporate both additive and non-additive effects into MAS with reference to the mass selection case. Four different indices are analytically examined in terms of the type of genetic components involved in the marker scores: phenotype-, general combining ability (GCA)-, and GCA and reciprocal effects-based marker scores. The phenotype-based marker index is applicable to any population of non-random mating, while the other three indices are applicable to the synthetic population derived from diallel crosses. All these indices may have higher selection efficiencies than the index with solely additive effects-associated markers as long as the detectable transient non-additive effects are present. The improvement in selection efficiency depends on the magnitude of non-additive variances and the proportion of them explained by markers. The index with the phenotype-based marker scores operates on the whole of the additive and non-additive effects, and has the largest selection efficiency. The indices with the GCA-based marker scores operate only on additive and additive-by-additive genetic variation and have relatively small selection efficiencies. Inclusion of the markers from organelle genomes can also increase selection efficiency, depending upon the proportion of the total genetic variation attributable to organelle genomes and the proportion of them explained by organelle genomic markers. Sharing of markers among different marker scores does not facilitate the improvement of selection efficiency.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Genetic Markers, epistatic effects, Epistasis, Genetic, Breeding, Alberta, Genetics, Population, Problems related to evolution, GCA, Genetics and epigenetics, Selection, Genetic, diallel cross, mass selection

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!