
pmid: 36997381
Letters of recommendation are ubiquitous in the research enterprise. Requesting, writing, and reviewing letters of recommendation are all fraught with bias, especially for individuals from groups historically excluded from research environments. We detail how letter reviewers, requesters, and writers can make letters of recommendation a more equitable tool to evaluate scientists.
Writing, Humans, Internship and Residency
Writing, Humans, Internship and Residency
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
