
pmid: 30497936
There is a moral logic to reasoning about political violence. People will often fight not for individual or collective material gain, but because of their commitment to abstract moral and sacred ideas. Moreover, decisions to support or oppose war are descriptively deontological, and are relatively insensitive to material costs or benefits.
cognition, 2805 Cognitive Neuroscience, Logic, rationality, Culture, Decision Making, Violence, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Morals, Violence and Aggression, 3206 Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Cognition, Humans, war, 3205 Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Politics, Social and Personality Psychology, morality, Intergroup Processes, Moral Behavior, culture, Psychology, other, political psychology
cognition, 2805 Cognitive Neuroscience, Logic, rationality, Culture, Decision Making, Violence, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Morals, Violence and Aggression, 3206 Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Cognition, Humans, war, 3205 Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Politics, Social and Personality Psychology, morality, Intergroup Processes, Moral Behavior, culture, Psychology, other, political psychology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
