
pmid: 23453751
Over 15 years ago, Michael Corballis and I first discussed the evolution of the human capacity to travel mentally in time [1]. Extensive research has since aimed to demonstrate similar nonhuman animal capacities [2], but Corballis and I have repeatedly found the evidence wanting [3,4]. It is hence noteworthy that, in light of new neuroscientific data [5,6], Corballis is now questioning whether mental time travel is uniquely human [7]. Here, I outline reasons why I think the evidence fails to show that animals travel mentally in time as humans do.
3206 Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, 2805 Cognitive Neuroscience, Thinking, 3205 Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Evolution, Memory, Animals, Humans, Future
3206 Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, 2805 Cognitive Neuroscience, Thinking, 3205 Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Evolution, Memory, Animals, Humans, Future
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 72 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
