
Although prior research has repeatedly emphasized that organizational heuristics unfold their proclaimed “superior” outcomes only through the very use of these rules-of-thumb, we know little about how actors actually use organizational heuristics “in practice”. In this paper, we develop a practice-based understanding of organizational heuristics, one that helps to unpack the “doing” of using organizational heuristics. By drawing on practice theory, we offer a reconceptualization of organizational heuristics that does justice to the enactment of these rules-of-thumb in response to the situation at hand, which can be consequential for both “superior” and “inferior” accomplishments. Our paper extends the literature on organizational heuristics by conceptualizing this concept as “heuristics-in-use”, and by offering insights into the contributions of enacting rules-of-thumb to organizational outcomes.
Organizational heuristics, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/1400/1403; name=Business and International Management, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/1400/1405; name=Management of Technology and Innovation, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/558218865; name=Management studies, Heuristics-in-use, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3200/3202; name=Applied Psychology, Heuristics-in-Use, Practical knowledge, Practice theory
Organizational heuristics, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/1400/1403; name=Business and International Management, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/1400/1405; name=Management of Technology and Innovation, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/558218865; name=Management studies, Heuristics-in-use, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3200/3202; name=Applied Psychology, Heuristics-in-Use, Practical knowledge, Practice theory
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
