
Planarians can regenerate any missing body part in a process requiring dividing cells called neoblasts. Historically, neoblasts have largely been considered a homogeneous stem cell population. Most studies, however, analyzed neoblasts at the population rather than the single-cell level, leaving the degree of heterogeneity in this population unresolved. We combined RNA sequencing of neoblasts from wounded planarians with expression screening and identified 33 transcription factors transcribed in specific differentiated cells and in small fractions of neoblasts during regeneration. Many neoblast subsets expressing distinct tissue-associated transcription factors were present, suggesting candidate specification into many lineages. Consistent with this possibility, klf, pax3/7, and FoxA were required for the differentiation of cintillo-expressing sensory neurons, dopamine-β-hydroxylase-expressing neurons, and the pharynx, respectively. Together, these results suggest that specification of cell fate for most-to-all regenerative lineages occurs within neoblasts, with regenerative cells of blastemas being generated from a highly heterogeneous collection of lineage-specified neoblasts.
Medicine (General), Base Sequence, Sensory Receptor Cells, QH301-705.5, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Stem Cells, Molecular Sequence Data, Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors, Cell Differentiation, Planarians, Article, R5-920, Hepatocyte Nuclear Factors, Animals, Paired Box Transcription Factors, Regeneration, RNA Interference, Biology (General), RNA, Small Interfering, Transcription Factors
Medicine (General), Base Sequence, Sensory Receptor Cells, QH301-705.5, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Stem Cells, Molecular Sequence Data, Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors, Cell Differentiation, Planarians, Article, R5-920, Hepatocyte Nuclear Factors, Animals, Paired Box Transcription Factors, Regeneration, RNA Interference, Biology (General), RNA, Small Interfering, Transcription Factors
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 207 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
