
This paper explores the sociological relevance of demanding encounters between doctors and patients. Borrowing from Potter and McKinlay's [(2005). From a relationship to encounter: an examination of longitudinal and lateral dimensions in the doctor-patient relationship. Social Science & Medicine, 61, 465-479] reconceptualization of the doctor-patient relationship, we suggest an analytic shift away from 'demanding patients' toward 'demanding encounters'. Such a shift places provider-patient conflict within a broader socio-cultural context, emphasizing constraints facing both doctor and patient as they interact in a clinical setting. Specifically, through an ethnographic study of doctor-patient interactions at the oncology clinic of a US University Hospital, we examine the respective influences of new information technologies and patient consumerism in the production of demanding encounters in oncology. Findings suggest that these interconnected socio-cultural realities, in tandem with patient tendencies to challenge physician judgment or expertise, play a role in demanding encounters. We conclude by considering the implications of demanding encounters for doctors, patients and healthcare organizations.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Physician-Patient Relations, Consumer Health Information, Patients, Attitude of Health Personnel, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Dissent and Disputes, Hospitals, University, Interviews as Topic, Patient Education as Topic, Socioeconomic Factors, Oncology Service, Hospital, Humans, Sociology, Medical, Female, Patient Participation, Aged
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Physician-Patient Relations, Consumer Health Information, Patients, Attitude of Health Personnel, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Dissent and Disputes, Hospitals, University, Interviews as Topic, Patient Education as Topic, Socioeconomic Factors, Oncology Service, Hospital, Humans, Sociology, Medical, Female, Patient Participation, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 46 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
