
pmid: 17123678
This paper compares three interpretations of women and the transmission of HIV in rural Malawi. One is disseminated world-wide by institutions with a global reach such as the World Health Organization in Geneva and United States Agency for International Development (USAID); the second is provided by urban Malawians situated in the capital of Lilongwe, the seat of government and the site of the many international and national non-governmental agencies; the third is articulated by rural women and men in Balaka District, Malawi. We focus on women's motivations for extramarital sex, using qualitative interview data. We find that whereas in Geneva and Lilongwe women from rural Malawi are said to engage in sexual relationships outside of marriage because they need money for survival, in Balaka they are said to be motivated not only by money for survival but also for attractive consumer goods as well as by passion and by revenge for a husband's infidelity. We also find that data collection procedures influence explanations for women's affairs, as does the respondent's gender. An implication of this study is that AIDS-prevention policies based on the view from Geneva and Lilongwe need modification for Balaka, and by implication for rural Africa more generally.
Adult, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Male, Rural Population, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Malawi, Adolescent, Sexual Behavior, HIV Infections, Social Environment, World Health Organization, Interviews as Topic, Humans, Spouses, Motivation, Data Collection, Reproducibility of Results, Extramarital Relations, Female
Adult, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Male, Rural Population, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Malawi, Adolescent, Sexual Behavior, HIV Infections, Social Environment, World Health Organization, Interviews as Topic, Humans, Spouses, Motivation, Data Collection, Reproducibility of Results, Extramarital Relations, Female
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 67 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
