
pmid: 15921969
Type 2 diabetes is a growing concern, with the number of new cases increasing and occurring at a younger age due to obesity. Consequently the number of cases arising in women of child-bearing age is increasing, and the condition will be encountered more frequently in the antenatal clinic. Type 2 diabetes is often perceived as a benign form of diabetes, but this is not the case when one examines pregnancy outcomes. Rates of perinatal mortality (25/1000) and congenital malformation (99/1000) are significantly greater than those in background populations and at least as poor as those in type 1 diabetes. The rates of hypertension, pre-eclampsia and postpartum haemorrhage are greater than the general maternity population, as is the rate of operative delivery. To improve outcomes we need to dispel the myth that type 2 diabetes is a benign condition. Educational programmes, population screening, and strategies to help vulnerable groups access the services available will increase our ability to identify and counsel women with type 2 diabetes early enough to make a difference.
Postpartum Hemorrhage, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy Outcome, Pregnancy in Diabetics, Prenatal Care, Delivery, Obstetric, Congenital Abnormalities, Abortion, Spontaneous, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Pre-Eclampsia, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Hypertension, Infant Mortality, Humans, Female, Fetal Death
Postpartum Hemorrhage, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy Outcome, Pregnancy in Diabetics, Prenatal Care, Delivery, Obstetric, Congenital Abnormalities, Abortion, Spontaneous, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Pre-Eclampsia, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Hypertension, Infant Mortality, Humans, Female, Fetal Death
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 47 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
