
Since the first prospective identification of cancer stem cells in solid cancers the cancer stem cell hypothesis has reemerged as a research topic of increasing interest. It postulates that solid cancers are organized hierarchically with a small number of cancer stem cells driving tumor growth, repopulation after injury and metastasis. They give rise to differentiated progeny, which lack these features. The model predicts that for any therapy to provide cure, all cancer stem cells have to be eliminated while the survival of differentiated progeny is less critical. In this review we discuss recent reports challenging the idea of a unidirectional differentiation of cancer cells. These reports provide evidence supporting the idea that non-stem cancer cells exhibit a remarkable degree of plasticity that allows them to re-acquire cancer stem cell traits, especially in the context of radiation therapy. We summarize conditions under which differentiation is reversed and discuss the current knowledge of the underlying mechanisms.
Cell Survival, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Regenerative Medicine, Clonal Evolution, Stem Cell Research - Nonembryonic - Human, Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Cancer, Neoplastic, Tumor, Radiotherapy, Cancer stem cells, Reprogramming, Cell Differentiation, Stem Cell Research, Tumor Burden, Radiation therapy, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic Stem Cells, Stem Cell Research - Nonembryonic - Non-Human, Biomarkers
Cell Survival, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Regenerative Medicine, Clonal Evolution, Stem Cell Research - Nonembryonic - Human, Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Cancer, Neoplastic, Tumor, Radiotherapy, Cancer stem cells, Reprogramming, Cell Differentiation, Stem Cell Research, Tumor Burden, Radiation therapy, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic Stem Cells, Stem Cell Research - Nonembryonic - Non-Human, Biomarkers
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 276 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
