
We examine here the case that in deformed austenitic stainless steels, the transformation texture should be calculated in two stages (M. Humbert et al. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 454–455 (2007) 508–517). The first stage involves the transformation of austenite into ϵ-martensite, which then changes into body-centred cubic (bcc) martensite. The procedure requires two fitting parameters, connected to the extent of variant selection. Our analysis shows that it may not be necessary to follow this procedure as the texture can be adequately calculated by considering direct transformation into bcc martensite. Some comments are also made about the calculation of the interaction energy between the applied stress and martensite.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 80 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
