
New services in the internet are changing the media communication structures and therewith the associated norms and rules of public communication and its terms of participation and use. Although the internet offers new freedom to communicate, it also provokes new problems such as the lack of control over the content. The article analyses how the internal regulatory structures of the providers are configured to enable an accountable use of the services. Here, the internal regulation of three social media providers is examined. Two aspects are relevant: The rules of the providers and the status of users. The results of the analysis propose a fragmented regulatory structure and divergence between the ideological postulates of excessive participation with social media providers and the de facto existing opportunities for participation of users in shaping the rules. As the results show, a concept of regulated self-regulation is necessary that establishes a culture of responsibility.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
