Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao The Science of The T...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
The Science of The Total Environment
Article . 2012 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

In vitro biocompatibility of solid lipid nanoparticles

Authors: Adny Henrique, Silva; Fabíola Branco, Filippin-Monteiro; Bruno, Mattei; Betina G, Zanetti-Ramos; Tânia Beatiz, Creczynski-Pasa;

In vitro biocompatibility of solid lipid nanoparticles

Abstract

This study was undertaken to address the current deficient knowledge of cellular response to solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) exposure. We investigated the cytotoxicity of several SLNs formulations in two fibroblast cell lineages, Vero and MDCK. Several methods were used to explore the mechanisms involved in this cytotoxic process, including cell viability assays, flow cytometry and ROS generation assessment. Among nanoparticles tested, two of them (F4 and F5) demonstrated more cytotoxic effects in both cell lineages. The cell viability assays suggested that F4 and F5 interfere in cell mitochondrial metabolism and in lysosomal activity. In addition, F5 decreased the percentage of MDCK cells in G0/G1 and G2/M phases, with a marked increase in the Sub/G1 population, suggesting DNA fragmentation. Regarding F4, although IC(50) was higher (~700 μg/mL), this formulation affected mitochondrial membrane potential for Vero cells. However, the IC(50) of F5 was around 250 μg/mL, suggesting the effect of SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) present in the formulation. In summary, the nanoparticles tested here appears to be biocompatible, with the exception of F5. Further studies are required to elucidate the in vivo effects of these nanoscale structures, in order to evaluate or predict the connotation of their increased and widespread use.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Membrane Potential, Mitochondrial, Cell Survival, Cell Cycle, Fibroblasts, Flow Cytometry, Lipids, Madin Darby Canine Kidney Cells, Dogs, Spectrometry, Fluorescence, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission, Chlorocebus aethiops, Animals, Nanoparticles, Reactive Oxygen Species, Vero Cells

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    41
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
41
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!