Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The harvesting system affects the quality and conservation of the ‘Tahiti’ acid lime

Authors: Meire Menezes Bassan; Francisco de Assis Alves Mourão Filho; Vanessa Cristina Caron; Hilton Thadeu Zarate do Couto; Angelo Pedro Jacomino;

The harvesting system affects the quality and conservation of the ‘Tahiti’ acid lime

Abstract

Abstract The inadequate management of ‘Tahiti’ acid lime harvesting has led to quality loss and reduced profitability for producers and exporters. This study evaluated the quality and conservation of ‘Tahiti’ acid limes for export using four different harvesting systems. Fruit were harvested with scissors, by twisting, with the help of a metal basket and with a hook. After harvesting, the fruit were processed and stored at 9 ± 2 °C and 75 ± 5% relative humidity (RH) for 30 d, simulating the conditions of export in refrigerated containers. The fruit were then transferred to 22 ± 2 °C and 75 ± 5% RH for 30 d, according to the commercialization conditions for the fruit. Harvesting with scissors led to a greater conservation of fresh mass, color and peel chlorophyll content of fruit compared with the use of a hook for harvesting. The levels of soluble solids, titratable acidity and ascorbic acid were not influenced by the harvesting system. Fruit harvested with a hook had a higher percentage of oleocellosis and a 30% reduction in the marketable amount compared with fruit harvested by scissors. Mechanical injuries caused during harvest also led to changes in the flavor and aroma of the ‘Tahiti’ acid limes. The results suggest that the physical damage incurred during harvesting prevents the postharvest treatments of ‘Tahiti’ acid limes from providing the expected response with regard to the maintenance of fruit quality and conservation.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!