Downloads provided by UsageCounts
[EN] The development of vision systems for identifying plants by leaves is an important challenge which has numerous applications ranging from food, medicine, industry and environment. Recently, several techniques have been proposed in the literature in order to identify plants in various fields of application. However, current techniques are restricted to the recognition and identification of plants using specific descriptors. In this paper, is accomplished a comparative analysis using different methods of feature extraction (textural, chromatic and geometric) and different methods of classification. The experiments are executed on very similar plants. Twelve sets of leaves with similar shape characteristics are studied using several classifiers. The performance of different combinations of classifiers-descriptors are analyzed in detail for each set. The results show that a combination of different feature extraction techniques is necessary in order to improve the performance. This combination of descriptors is more necessary when the leaves have similar characteristics.
Este estudio fue financiado por la Secretaria de Investigación de la Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México con el proyecto de investigación 3771/2014/CIB.
Control engineering systems. Automatic machinery (General), SVM, Características, Data Sets, Conjuntos de Datos, Clasificación, Classification, Descriptors, Control and Systems Engineering, TJ212-225, Descriptores, Computer Science(all)
Control engineering systems. Automatic machinery (General), SVM, Características, Data Sets, Conjuntos de Datos, Clasificación, Classification, Descriptors, Control and Systems Engineering, TJ212-225, Descriptores, Computer Science(all)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 458 | |
| downloads | 527 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts