
pmid: 30391547
We measured respiratory flow, breath duration, and calculated tidal volume (VT) in nine belugas (Delphinapterus leucas, mean measured body mass: 628 ± 151 kg, n = 5) housed in managed care facilities. Both spontaneous (resting at station) and trained maximal respirations (chuffs) were measured. The mean (±s.d.) inspiratory VT for spontaneous breaths (16.7 ± 4.7 l, range: 7.5-18.7 l) was larger than those predicted based on respiratory scaling equations from terrestrial mammals and was 32 ± 10% of estimated total lung capacity (TLCest) based on an equation from static measurements made on a range of cetaceans and pinniped lungs, and 52 ± 18% of estimated vital capacities (VC, mean: 27.7 ± 8.9 l, range: 16.7-40.3 l) based on respiratory measurements obtained during trained maximal respirations. Expiratory flow (V˙exp, spontaneous: 26.1 ± 5.5 l s-1, chuff: 66.8 ± 22.5 l s-1) was significantly higher as compared with inspiratory flow (V˙insp, spontaneous: 22.3 ± 4.6 l s-1, chuff: 30.1 ± 8.4 l s-1), and the maximal expiratory flow recorded was 212 l s-1. The breath duration was shorter for forced breaths (Expiration: 518 ± 101 ms; Inspiration: 905 ± 170 ms; Total: 1423 ± 227 ms) as compared with spontaneous breaths (Expiration: 995 ± 176 ms; Inspiration: 1098 ± 219 ms; Total: 2093 ± 302 ms). These data provide baseline estimates of the respiratory capacity of belugas.
Male, Respiration, Vital Capacity, Tidal Volume, Animals, Female, Beluga Whale, Respiratory Function Tests
Male, Respiration, Vital Capacity, Tidal Volume, Animals, Female, Beluga Whale, Respiratory Function Tests
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
