
ResumenLa artroscopia de cadera ha evolucionado en los últimos años tanto en los aspectos técnicos como en los niveles de evidencia científica. La historia clínica y la exploración física son sin duda los mecanismos más frecuentes y más fiables para el diagnóstico de patologías de cadera que pueden muchas de ellas ser resueltas por técnicas mínimamente invasivas como la artroscopia y la endoscopia. La evaluación tanto pre- como postoperatoria con cuestionarios específicos de cadera nos permiten objetivar los resultados de nuestra cirugía y ayudarnos en nuestro árbol de decisión al plantear los tratamientos más adecuados a nuestros pacientes.AbstractHip arthroscopy has progressed over the last few years, both in technical aspects and scientific evidence level. Clinical history and physical examination are without a doubt the most common and reliable tools for diagnosis of hip pathologies. Many of these pathologies can be resolved by minimally invasive surgery such as arthroscopy or endoscopy. The evaluation before and after surgery with hip-specific questionnaires allows us to objectify the outcomes of our surgeries, as well as helping us with our decision algorithm when it comes to planning the most appropriate treatment for our patients.
Questionnaires, Evaluación física, Artroscopia de cadera, Exploración de cadera, Physical examination, Surgical indications, Escalas, Indicaciones quirúrgicas, Hip exploration, Hip arthroscopy
Questionnaires, Evaluación física, Artroscopia de cadera, Exploración de cadera, Physical examination, Surgical indications, Escalas, Indicaciones quirúrgicas, Hip exploration, Hip arthroscopy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
