Critiquing a research article

Name: Critiquing a research article
Creator: Gill Marshall
Keywords: 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, 3. Good health

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Feb 2005 English Publisher:Elsevier BVJournal:Radiography, volume 11, pages 55-59 (issn: 1078-8174,

Authors: Gill Marshall;

doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2004.09.001

Critiquing a research article

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

This article explores certain concepts relating to critiquing research papers. These include considering the peer review process for publication, demonstrating the need for critiquing, providing a way to carefully evaluate research papers and exploring the role of impact factors. Whilst all these features are considered in this article, the focus is on presenting a systematic and comprehensive way of critiquing research papers. The information provided should be of use to the many radiographers, associated health professionals and undergraduate and postgraduate students embarking on research projects.

Related Organizations

Saint Martin's University
United States
St Martin's College
United Kingdom

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	12
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average