Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Practical Radiation ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Practical Radiation Oncology
Article . 2015 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Planar IGRT dose reduction: A practical approach

Authors: Alec M, Block; Jason, Luce; Jeffrey Y, Lin; Mark A, Hoggarth; John C, Roeske;

Planar IGRT dose reduction: A practical approach

Abstract

To retrospectively estimate the cumulative absorbed dose (at the skin) from kilovoltage planar x-rays received by 90 patients treated on a Varian iX and to determine if that dose could be reduced without sacrificing image quality.To estimate surface dose, measurements were obtained using the "in-air" method by varying the source-to-detector distance from 80 to 100 cm in steps of 5 cm. Energy was varied from 70 to 120 kVp. Using these data, a global equation was developed to estimate the cumulative skin dose by applying the imaging settings (kVp, mAs), patient-specific source-to-skin distance, and total number of images. To reduce the imaging dose, anterior and lateral images of RANDO phantoms were obtained using the same kVp; however, the mAs settings were systematically reduced. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were calculated for both the standard phantom images and reduced mAs images. The mAs values were chosen to minimize skin dose while maintaining a similar CNR. Last, daily kV anterior and lateral images were obtained using these reduced mAs settings for 7 patients currently being treated with image guided radiation therapy. CNR was determined and compared with the values obtained on images taken 1 day before this change.Average cumulative kV imaging dose was as large as 162.2 cGy for pelvic cases with standard kVp, mAs. Other doses varied by site and technique. By lowering mAs, this dose could be reduced by 49% with only a 0.9% decrease in CNR. For the 7 patients currently being treated with image guided radiation therapy, CNR values were not statistically different (P = .79), whereas the skin dose was reduced by an average of approximately 50%.kV planar imaging dose reduction should be considered, given the large cumulative skin dose for certain disease sites. When mAs are reduced, planar dose reduction is clinically feasible without sacrificing image quality.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Phantoms, Imaging, Middle Aged, Thorax, Radiation Dosage, Pelvis, Young Adult, Child, Preschool, Neoplasms, Humans, Female, Child, Aged, Radiotherapy, Image-Guided, Retrospective Studies, Skin

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!