
AbstractThis work was performed in a pension fund as part of the construction of a method for evaluating the performance improvements of business processes, whose goal is to raise the vision of the future perceived by professionals working in the organization to check the “desirable” status and make gap analysis in relation to academic studies on the subject, based on reference article of Rosemann, Indulska, et al., which analyzed current issues and future challenges on modeling processes using three groups: academics, practitioners and professional tool vendors. It is hoped that this paper will contribute in three ways: aligning the future vision of the organization with the academic vision for improving their business processes, providing feedback to strategic process in relation to the pillars of Process Management and improving self-knowledge about their organizational vision of future in the area of process improvement.
Gap analysis, Performance improvement, Strategic processes, Process management
Gap analysis, Performance improvement, Strategic processes, Process management
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
