
handle: 10044/1/38678
Ductile damage in metallic materials is caused by the nucleation, growth and coalesce of voids and micro-cracks in the metal matrix when it is subjected to plastic strain. A considerable number of models have been proposed to represent ductile failure focusing on the ultimate failure conditions; however, only some of them study in detail the whole damage accumulation process. The aim of this work is to review experimental techniques developed by various authors to measure the accumulation of ductile damage under tensile loads. The measurement methods reviewed include: stiffness degradation, indentation, microstructure analysis, ultrasonic waves propagation, X-ray tomography and electrical potential drop. Stiffness degradation and indentation techniques have been tested on stainless steel 304L hourglass-shaped samples. A special interest is placed in the Continuum Damage Mechanics approach (CDM) as its equations incorporate macroscopic parameters that can represent directly the damage accumulation measured in the experiments. The other main objective lies in identifying the strengths and weaknesses of each technique for the assessment of materials subjected to different strain-rate and temperature conditions.
Ductile damage, CDM, Voids, 600, High strain-rate, 620, Ultrasonic waves, Electrical potential drop, DIC, Digital Image Correlation, Stainless steel 304L, Mechanical engineering and machinery, Indentation, TJ, Continuum Damage Mechanics, X-ray tomography, Elastic modulus
Ductile damage, CDM, Voids, 600, High strain-rate, 620, Ultrasonic waves, Electrical potential drop, DIC, Digital Image Correlation, Stainless steel 304L, Mechanical engineering and machinery, Indentation, TJ, Continuum Damage Mechanics, X-ray tomography, Elastic modulus
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
