
AbstractThe present work focuses on the applicability of the mandrel peel test to quantify the fracture toughness of woven fabric Carbon/PEEK composites. For this purpose, the mandrel peel test was compared to the standardized DCB test. Unstable crack propagation (stick-slip) was observed in both testing techniques. Nevertheless, each time unstable crack propagation occurs it is arrested by the mandrel. As a result more crack re-initiations were observed per unit crack length. This effect is expected to increase the statistical relevance of a single test and thereby increases the reliability of the test. As an additional advantage the mandrel peel test is very easy to perform compared to the DCB test. The crosshead speed and the peel arm width were varied in this study to obtain the influence of these variables on the test results. Fractographic investigations were performed to study the nature of the crack propagation for the two different testing techniques.
mandrel peel test, METIS-317457, thermoplastic composite materials, Fracture mechanics, IR-100912
mandrel peel test, METIS-317457, thermoplastic composite materials, Fracture mechanics, IR-100912
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
