
AbstractA reliable prediction of ductile failure in metals is still a wide-open matter of research. Among different models, Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman (GTN) has been used extensively. One major issue is the accurate identification of GTN model parameters, which it is not possible to perform experiments for their evaluation. In the present paper a novel inverse procedure aimed to estimate the material parameters of the GTN porosity-based plastic damage model by means of RSM method is represented. The results showed good agreement between experimental and predicted forming limit diagrams when determined GTN parameters were utilized. FE-simulation by means of Abaqus software used to predict FLDs. © 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of ICM11
Response surface methodology, GTN model, Forming limit diagram, Simulation, Engineering(all)
Response surface methodology, GTN model, Forming limit diagram, Simulation, Engineering(all)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 37 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
