
Abstract Many real world datasets don’t offer enough training input for regular classifiers: some classes are more represented than others. Imbalanced data raises problems in Machine Learning classification and predicting an outcome becomes difficult when there is not enough data to learn from. The object of classification in our study is data coming from the field of Human Resources, consisting of short descriptions of work experiences which must be classified into several highly imbalanced classes expressing job types. We perform an extensive experimental analysis using various representations of text data, several classification algorithms and balancing schemes to derive a model that achieves highest performance with respect to metrics such as precision and recall. The contribution is twofold: a) with a comprehensive experimental design, the analysis is focused on studying the interactions between classification algorithms, text vectorization choices and the schemes to deal with data imbalance at several degrees of imbalance; b) besides state-of-the-art balancing schemes, we propose and analyze a cost sensitive approach formulated as a numerical optimization problem where the costs are derived with a Differential Evolution algorithm in two steps: in a first step costs are optimized at the class level and in a subsequent step costs are refined at the data instance level. The results indicate that the use of cost-sensitive classifiers where the cost matrices are optimized with a Differential Evolution algorithm brings important benefits on our real-world problem.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 118 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
