
Abstract In many situations a decision maker (DM) would like to grade a component, or rank several components of the same type. Often a component type has many features, which are deemed as valuable by the DM. Other vital features are not known by the DM but are needed for the component to function. However, it should be possible to guide the DM to find the desired business solution, without putting a requirement of detailed knowledge of the component type on the DM. We propose a framework for component selection with the help of fuzzy decision making. The work is based on algorithms from fuzzy decision making, which we have adapted or extended. The framework was validated by practitioners, which found the framework useful.
Programvaruteknik, minimization of regret, Computer Sciences, component selection, Software Engineering, Max-prod compositions, Decision makers, Business solutions, Datavetenskap (datalogi), fuzzy decision making, max-prod composition, Knowledge based systems, Decision making
Programvaruteknik, minimization of regret, Computer Sciences, component selection, Software Engineering, Max-prod compositions, Decision makers, Business solutions, Datavetenskap (datalogi), fuzzy decision making, max-prod composition, Knowledge based systems, Decision making
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
