
In Wire Electrical Discharge Machining (WEDM) the erosion process is based on the superposition of craters. The plasma channel and the craters’ shape have an impact on the process and on the characteristics of the machined surface. This impact goes from the cutting speed to the surface roughness passing through workpiece temperature gradient during the spark. Several models simulate the crater formation through thermal analysis, yielding symmetrical shapes. Commonly non-homogeneous and random aspects in the dielectric and the electrode geometry are neglected. Such features introduce an asymmetric aspect to the crater shape. To investigate the influence of the tool electrode geometry on the craters’ shape, single craters on steel are produced at different pulse energy levels and with three different wire diameters 0.20mm, 0.25mm and 0.30mm. An optical microscope is used to map the single craters’ topography and subsequently extract their dimensions. The single craters’ lengths and aspect ratio are analyzed. In the lower energy range the random aspects dominate the crater shape, the craters are smaller and rounder. Higher energy pulses create consistently bigger and elongated craters. The aspect ratio depends on the wire geometry, thinner wires produce more elongated craters. This behavior reinforces the idea that from a certain energy level on the tool geometry effects overcome the random aspect of the process, generating elongated craters.
21st CIRP Conference on Electro Physical and Chemical Machining, ISEM XXI
Procedia CIRP, 113
ISSN:2212-8271
Crater dimensions, WEDM, Crater size, Wire geometry, Crater size; Crater dimensions; Wire geometry; WEDM
Crater dimensions, WEDM, Crater size, Wire geometry, Crater size; Crater dimensions; Wire geometry; WEDM
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
