
Abstract Rates of gasification of lignite char were compared when gasification with CO 2 was undertaken in a fluidised bed of either (i) an active Fe-based oxygen carrier used for chemical looping or (ii) inert sand. The kinetics of the gasification were found to be significantly faster in the presence of the oxygen carrier, especially at temperatures above 1123 K. An analytical solution assuming pseudo-binary diffusion of species was developed to account for external and internal mass transfer and for the effect of the looping agent. The model also included the effects of the evolution of the pore structure at different conversions. The results are compared with a full numerical model using the Stefan–Maxwell equations. Excellent agreement was observed between the rates predicted by the two models and those observed experimentally at T ⩽ 1123 K. At 1173 K, the pseudo-binary model predicted slightly higher rates than the full numerical solution. It was found that a significant share of the error of the predicted rates with the analytical solution was caused by an underestimation of intraparticle diffusional resistance rather than by assuming a pseudo-binary system external to the particle. Both models suggested that the presence of Fe 2 O 3 led to an increase in the rate of gasification because of the rapid oxidation of CO by the oxygen carrier to CO 2 . This resulted in the removal of CO and maintained a higher mole fraction of CO 2 in the mixture of gas around the particle of char, i . e . within the mass transfer boundary layer surrounding the particle. This effect was most prominent at ∼20% conversion when (i) the surface area for reaction was a maximum and (ii) because of the accompanying increase in porosity, intraparticle resistance to gas mass transfer within the particle of char had fallen, compared with that in the initial particle.
4004 Chemical Engineering, 40 Engineering
4004 Chemical Engineering, 40 Engineering
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
