Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Polymer Degradation ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Polymer Degradation and Stability
Article . 2014 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Mesophilic anaerobic biodegradation test and analysis of eubacteria and archaea involved in anaerobic biodegradation of four specified biodegradable polyesters

Authors: Hisaaki Yagi; Fumi Ninomiya; Masahiro Funabashi; Masao Kunioka;

Mesophilic anaerobic biodegradation test and analysis of eubacteria and archaea involved in anaerobic biodegradation of four specified biodegradable polyesters

Abstract

The anaerobic biodegradability of four bioplastics powders (125–250 μm), polycaprolactone (PCL), poly(lactic acid) (PLA), polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) and poly(butylene succinate) (PBS), were compared at 37 °C under aquatic conditions using our previously reported evaluation system (the modified ISO 13975 method). The bioplastics were ranked PHB >> PLA > PCL in terms of anaerobic biodegradation rate. The biodegradability of PHB, PLA, and PCL was 90% in 9 days, 29% and 49% in 277 days, and 3% and 22% in 277 days, respectively. PBS could not be anaerobically biodegraded by the sludge used in this study. The eubacteria and archaea participating in anaerobic bioplastic biodegradation were detected using the RT-PCR DGGE method. Some eubacteria participating in anaerobic biodegradation of PCL and PLA were of unique character. Eubacteria involved in anaerobic biodegradation of PHB were 98% homologous with Arcobacter thereius, Clostridium sp, and Clostridium sp, respectively. The eubacteria involved in the anaerobic biodegradation of PLA were 100% identical to Xanthomonadaceae bacterium and Mesorhizobium sp.; however, the other three bacterium were poorly related (<95% similarity) to any of the cultured-bacterium or database sequences. Anaerobic biodegradation of PCL was conducted by eubacterium with 98% similarity to A thereius, and by five organisms with poor similarity (≤95%) to any of the cultured-bacterium or database sequences. Archaea involved in anaerobic biodegradation of PLA and PCL were 97% and 95% identical to Methanosaeta concilii and Methanobacterium petrolearium. Only faint bands were observed in the RT-PCR DGGE profile of the archaea generated during PHB anaerobic biodegradation.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    116
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
116
Top 1%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!