
Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is usually taken to express a limitation of operational possibilities imposed by quantum mechanics. Here we demonstrate that the full content of this principle also includes its positive role as a condition ensuring that mutually exclusive experimental options can be reconciled if an appropriate trade-off is accepted. The uncertainty principle is shown to appear in three manifestations, in the form of uncertainty relations: for the widths of the position and momentum distributions in any quantum state; for the inaccuracies of any joint measurement of these quantities; and for the inaccuracy of a measurement of one of the quantities and the ensuing disturbance in the distribution of the other quantity. Whilst conceptually distinct, these three kinds of uncertainty relations are shown to be closely related formally. Finally, we survey models and experimental implementations of joint measurements of position and momentum and comment briefly on the status of experimental tests of the uncertainty principle.
published version
disturbance, Quantum Physics, QUANTUM-MECHANICS, JOINT MEASUREMENTS, PHASE, FOS: Physical sciences, joint measurement, uncertainty principle, NEUTRON INTERFEROMETRY, inaccuracy, POPPERS EXPERIMENT, HIDDEN VARIABLES, COPENHAGEN INTERPRETATION, POSITION, Quantum Physics (quant-ph), MOMENTUM OBSERVABLES, LONGITUDINAL COHERENCE
disturbance, Quantum Physics, QUANTUM-MECHANICS, JOINT MEASUREMENTS, PHASE, FOS: Physical sciences, joint measurement, uncertainty principle, NEUTRON INTERFEROMETRY, inaccuracy, POPPERS EXPERIMENT, HIDDEN VARIABLES, COPENHAGEN INTERPRETATION, POSITION, Quantum Physics (quant-ph), MOMENTUM OBSERVABLES, LONGITUDINAL COHERENCE
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 377 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
