Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Physiotherapyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Physiotherapy
Article . 2009 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Physiotherapy Research International
Article . 2008 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Hamstring length in patellofemoral pain syndrome

Authors: Lisa C, White; Philippa, Dolphin; John, Dixon;

Hamstring length in patellofemoral pain syndrome

Abstract

AbstractPurpose. To investigate whether there was a difference in hamstring length between patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome and healthy asymptomatic control participants between 18 and 35 years old. Relevance. Short hamstrings may produce greater patellofemoral joint reaction forces. Only three studies, which had conflicting results, have measured the hamstring length in this patient group (Smith et al., 1991; Witvrouw et al., 2000; Piva et al., 2005). Subjects. Two groups were tested, one was diagnosed with patellofemoral pain syndrome (mean age 27 years, n = 11, six males, five females) and one was of asymptomatic control participants (mean age 25 years, n = 25, 13 males, 12 females). Methods. Ethical approval was granted by the Local Research Ethics Committee and a cross‐sectional observational study was carried out in a hospital's physiotherapy department. Hamstring length was evaluated using the passive knee extension method and a masked universal goniometer to measure the popliteal angle. Analysis. An independent t‐test was used to evaluate between‐group differences. Results. Mean (standard deviation) values for hamstring length were 145.6 (8.7)° for the patellofemoral pain patients and 153.7 (10.1)° for the asymptomatic control participants. The mean (95% confidence interval) difference between the groups was 8.0 (0.8 to 15.1)°, and this was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Discussion. Although limited by a small sample size, these results show that hamstring length is shorter in the patellofemoral patient group than in the asymptomatic participants. It is unclear whether this is a cause or an effect of the condition. Further research should study how hamstring length changes with rehabilitation and its relationships with pain. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Adolescent, Reproducibility of Results, Cross-Sectional Studies, Sex Factors, Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome, Case-Control Studies, Humans, Female, Muscle, Skeletal

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    65
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
65
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!