
handle: 10044/1/25876
Mark-and-Recapture is a methodology from Population Biology to estimate the population of a species without counting every individual. This is done by multiple samplings of the species using traps and discounting the instances that were caught repeated. In this paper we show that this methodology is applicable for bibliographic analysis as it is also not feasible to count all the relevant publications of a research topic. In addition this estimation also allows us to propose a stopping rule for researchers to decide how far one should extend their search for relevant literature.
STOPPING RULES, Science & Technology, Multidisciplinary, Physics, Bibliographic analysis, Mark-and-Recapture, NETWORKS, SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, CAPTURE-RECAPTURE, ARTICLES, NUMBER, Physical Sciences
STOPPING RULES, Science & Technology, Multidisciplinary, Physics, Bibliographic analysis, Mark-and-Recapture, NETWORKS, SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, CAPTURE-RECAPTURE, ARTICLES, NUMBER, Physical Sciences
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
