
arXiv: 1304.7638
We study the lobby index (l-index for short) as a local node centrality measure for complex networks. The l-inde is compared with degree (a local measure), betweenness and Eigenvector centralities (two global measures) in the case of biological network (Yeast interaction protein-protein network) and a linguistic network (Moby Thesaurus II). In both networks, the l-index has poor correlation with betweenness but correlates with degree and Eigenvector. Being a local measure, one can take advantage by using the l-index because it carries more information about its neighbors when compared with degree centrality, indeed it requires less time to compute when compared with Eigenvector centrality. Results suggests that l-index produces better results than degree and Eigenvector measures for ranking purposes, becoming suitable as a tool to perform this task.
11 pages, 4 figures. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1005.4803
Statistics and Probability, Social and Information Networks (cs.SI), FOS: Computer and information sciences, Physics - Physics and Society, Eigenvector, FOS: Physical sciences, Computer Science - Social and Information Networks, Computer Science - Digital Libraries, Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph), Condensed Matter Physics, Betweenness, Degree, Centrality, Hirsch index, Digital Libraries (cs.DL), Lobby index
Statistics and Probability, Social and Information Networks (cs.SI), FOS: Computer and information sciences, Physics - Physics and Society, Eigenvector, FOS: Physical sciences, Computer Science - Social and Information Networks, Computer Science - Digital Libraries, Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph), Condensed Matter Physics, Betweenness, Degree, Centrality, Hirsch index, Digital Libraries (cs.DL), Lobby index
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
