
handle: 11693/20763
Abstract We analyze the cross-correlation matrix C of the index returns of the main financial markets after the 2008 crisis using methods of random matrix theory. We test the eigenvalues of C for universal properties of random matrices and find that the majority of the cross-correlation coefficients arise from randomness. We show that the eigenvector of the largest deviating eigenvalue of C represents a global market itself. We reveal that high volatility of financial markets is observed at the same times with high correlations between them which lowers the risk diversification potential even if one constructs a widely internationally diversified portfolio of stocks. We identify and compare the connection and cluster structure of markets before and after the crisis using minimal spanning and ultrametric hierarchical trees. We find that after the crisis, the co-movement degree of the markets increases. We also highlight the key financial markets of pre and post crisis using main centrality measures and analyze the changes. We repeat the study using rank correlation and compare the differences. Further implications are discussed.
Complex systems, Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions, Cross-correlations, Cross-correlation matrix, Large scale systems, Risk diversification, International trade, 332, Cross-correlation coefficient, Matrix algebra, Random matrix theory, Minimal spanning tree, Centrality measures, Random variables, Finance, Universal properties
Complex systems, Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions, Cross-correlations, Cross-correlation matrix, Large scale systems, Risk diversification, International trade, 332, Cross-correlation coefficient, Matrix algebra, Random matrix theory, Minimal spanning tree, Centrality measures, Random variables, Finance, Universal properties
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 45 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
