
pmid: 19879205
Current literature suggests that waist circumference may be marginally better than BMI as a surrogate marker for total body fat and can identify thinner people with increased visceral adipose tissue and increased cardiometabolic risk. This commentary explores the use of WC in primary care, including how and when to measure, and how to use the results.
Male, Metabolic Syndrome, Primary Health Care, Racial Groups, Reproducibility of Results, Intra-Abdominal Fat, Risk Assessment, Body Mass Index, Risk Factors, Body Composition, Humans, Female, Waist Circumference
Male, Metabolic Syndrome, Primary Health Care, Racial Groups, Reproducibility of Results, Intra-Abdominal Fat, Risk Assessment, Body Mass Index, Risk Factors, Body Composition, Humans, Female, Waist Circumference
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
