Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Otolaryngologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Otolaryngology
Article . 2007 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
Otolaryngology
Article . 2011
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Neck dissection for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Authors: Peter L, Santa Maria; Chady, Sader; Neil J M, Preston; Philip H, Fisher;

Neck dissection for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Abstract

To investigate the successes and failures of 172 patients receiving neck dissections for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) managed through a multidisciplinary head and neck clinic and to observe factors in predicting failure (death with head and neck cancer or local regional recurrence) or local regional recurrence alone.A retrospective, 14-year surgical audit.The information from patient medical records was correlated with that of a database. Multivariate analysis was performed with the use of a logistic regression model.The most common site for head and neck SCC was the oral cavity (42%), with 17% of patients having tumors of unknown primary site. The disease-free survival probability was 76.7% at five years. Patients who were older at neck dissection, were nonsmokers, or who did not have radiotherapy to the primary site were more likely to die with head and neck cancer or to have local regional recurrence (P < 0.1). Patients with more radical neck dissections did not have better survival or recurrence outcomes. Lymphatic invasion appears to be the only important factor in predicting local regional recurrence alone (P = 0.1), of which 67% occurred within the first postoperative year.Patients with smoking-related SCC are likely to have a less aggressive disease. Adjuvant radiotherapy plays an important role in the treatment of patients with head and neck SCC. Follow-up, especially within the first postoperative year, is essential in managing head and neck SCC. Head and neck surgeons can confidently continue their practice away from more radical neck dissections.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Middle Aged, Disease-Free Survival, Medical Records, Logistic Models, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Multivariate Analysis, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Neck Dissection, Female, Mouth Neoplasms, Radiotherapy, Adjuvant, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Neoplasm Staging, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!