
pmid: 17011419
OBJECTIVETo determine the outcome of laryngotracheal separation (LTS) in 60 patients in terms of the control and prevention of severe and persistent aspiration, morbidity and mortality, reversibility rate, and the influence of the presence of a tracheostomy.STUDY DESIGNRetrospective study.RESULTSLTS showed significant efficacy rates in terms of both treatment (87%) and prevention (100%) of pulmonary aspiration. Twenty‐six (43%) patients developed postoperative complications. A tracheocutaneous fistula of the proximal tracheal stump was observed in 14 (23%) patients and was the most frequent complication, especially in patients with a therapeutic indication (P = 0.028) and in those with a tracheostomy (P = 0.058). Reversion of LTS was possible in 12 (20%) patients, mainly those with a prophylactic indication (P = 0.005). However, the rates of complications (58%) and inefficacy (27%) of reversion surgery were high.CONCLUSIONLTS is effective in the elimination and prevention of clinically intractable aspiration. The procedure is potentially reversible. However, the frequency of complications for both LTS and reversion surgery is significant.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Respiratory Aspiration, Middle Aged, Trachea, Tracheostomy, Treatment Outcome, Child, Preschool, Chronic Disease, Humans, Female, Larynx, Child, Aged, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Respiratory Aspiration, Middle Aged, Trachea, Tracheostomy, Treatment Outcome, Child, Preschool, Chronic Disease, Humans, Female, Larynx, Child, Aged, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 36 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
