
pmid: 17071299
BACKGROUNDGastric pull‐up is a useful method for reconstruction of the upper digestive tract, with considerable morbidity/mortality, especially in esophageal cancers (EC)OBJECTIVETo analyze the experience of a multidisciplinary team with a laparoscopic gastric pull‐up (LGPU) method, with or without thoracoscopy, in a series of 120 patients with EC.STUDY DESIGNRetrospective.PATIENTS AND METHODSFrom 1992 to 2004, 120 EC [cervical/cervicothoracic (3.0%), middle third (15.0%), and inferior third (82.0%)]. Most were squamous cell carcinomas (47.0%) and adenocarcinomas (34.0%). Stomach was dissected and mobilized exclusively by laparoscopy. Occasionally, laparoscopic approach was extended cranially, until connecting with cervical dissection. In other cases, dissection of thoracic esophagus was accomplished through a thoracoscopic approach.RESULTSEighty‐one patients (68.0%) had LGPU; 39 (32.0%) needed thoracoscopy. Mortality was 5.9%. Complications were fistula (10.0%) and pneumonia (10.0%). All fistulae closed spontaneously; 89.2% of patients could swallow a normal oral diet.CONCLUSIONLow morbidity/mortality of LGPU for EC compared favorably with conventional techniques.
Male, Patient Care Team, Esophageal Neoplasms, Thoracoscopy, Stomach, Adenocarcinoma, Middle Aged, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Postoperative Complications, Treatment Outcome, Esophagoplasty, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Pharynx, Female, Laparoscopy, Retrospective Studies
Male, Patient Care Team, Esophageal Neoplasms, Thoracoscopy, Stomach, Adenocarcinoma, Middle Aged, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Postoperative Complications, Treatment Outcome, Esophagoplasty, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Pharynx, Female, Laparoscopy, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
