
pmid: 21978902
This review describes the sequential learning from initial free tissue grafting reconstructive techniques to the current use of vascularized flaps. Outcomes and limitations of current endoscopic reconstructive techniques are discussed, including a systematic review of the outcomes of endoscopic endonasal techniques to reconstruct large skull base defects (ESBR). The various endoscopic techniques for local and regional flaps in skull base reconstruction are described. Additionally, EMBASE (1980-December 7, 2010) and Medline (1950 - November 14, 2010) were searched using a search strategy designed to include any endoscopic endonasal reconstruction of the skull base. The manuscripts selected were subject to full text review to extract data on perioperative outcomes for ESBR. Surgical technique was used for sub-group analysis.
Skull Base, Humans, Endoscopy, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Skull Base Neoplasms, Surgical Flaps
Skull Base, Humans, Endoscopy, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Skull Base Neoplasms, Surgical Flaps
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 83 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
